ai travel planning.

I Tested 9 AI Trip Planners With the Same Prompt — Only 2 Actually Worked

AI trip planners are everywhere in 2026. But do they actually work? I tested 9 tools with the same travel prompt to see which ones produce realistic itineraries—and which ones completely fail.

piyush singh mandavi

• 4 min read
I Tested 9 AI Trip Planners With the Same Prompt — Only 2 Actually Worked
A split-screen image comparing two travel planning experiences. On the left, in a dimly lit room, a stressed woman with glasses holds her head, overwhelmed by a laptop screen showing chaotic 'AI TRAVEL PLANS' with tangled flight paths between New York, Cairo, Tokyo, and Oslo. Her desk is cluttered with maps and crumpled paper. On the right, in a bright, sunlit room, a smiling man with a beard sits at a neat desk overlooking a city and ocean. He points at his laptop screen displaying a clean 'PORTUGAL ADVENTURE: 12-Day Itinerary' for Lisbon, Porto, and Algarve. This organized side also includes a map, passport, pen, and phone
Image
Image

Travel planning is supposed to be fun.

But if you’ve ever tried planning a proper trip — flights, hotels, visa timing, places to visit, budget — it quickly turns into something that feels like solving a JEE physics question.

So I had a question.

Everyone on the internet is talking about AI trip planners.

But… do they actually work?

Or is this just another “AI will change everything” story?

So I decided to test them.

Not casually.
I gave 9 AI travel planners the exact same prompt and compared what they produced.

And the result was… interesting.

Some tools were genuinely helpful.
Some felt like they were written by a travel blogger who never left their room.

Let’s get into it.

The Prompt I Used

Image
Image

I didn’t want an easy test like:

“Plan a trip to Paris.”

That’s too simple.

Real travel is messy. So I gave them this:

Plan a 10-day digital nomad trip in Europe.
Budget: $2500 including flights.
Good Wi-Fi required.
Mix of cities and relaxing locations.
Avoid very touristy places.
Start in Lisbon and end near a beach town.

Simple enough for a human.

But for AI?

This is where things get interesting.

What I Expected

Honestly, I thought most AI planners would do something like this:

Day 1: Arrive Lisbon
Day 2: Explore Lisbon
Day 3: Travel somewhere

Very generic.

Like those school essays where you write:

“Tourism is very important for the economy.”

Technically correct… but not helpful.

But some tools surprised me.

What Actually Happened

Image
Image
Image

The 9 tools fell into three categories.

1. The “Travel Blog Generators”

Some planners clearly just generate text.

They say things like:

“Enjoy charming streets and vibrant culture.”

Cool.

But where exactly am I staying?

Which train?
How much does it cost?

It’s like asking someone for directions and they reply:

“Just follow your dreams.”

Not helpful.

2. The Over-Confident AI

Image
Image
Image

Some planners were extremely confident.

They recommended:

  • $400 hotels
  • Flights that didn’t exist
  • 8-hour travel days between cities

One planner literally suggested:

Lisbon → Prague → Barcelona → Athens
in 10 days.

That’s not a trip.

That’s a speed-run of European airports.

3. The Ones That Actually Worked

Image
Image

Only two tools produced plans that made sense.

They respected:

  • budget
  • travel distance
  • realistic schedules
  • good internet spots

And the trip actually looked like something a digital nomad would enjoy.

Example route:

Lisbon → Porto → Algarve coast

Balanced.

Not rushed.

Plenty of time to work and explore.

Which is exactly what I asked for.

One Tool I Tried That Was Interesting

Image
Image

While researching travel AI tools, I also tested a project called SearchSpot.

Instead of just generating itineraries, it focuses more on search-style travel queries.

Things like:

  • best train between cities
  • travel timing
  • location specific recommendations

You can check it here:

👉 https://searchspot.ai

What I liked is that it feels less like a “travel blog generator” and more like a travel research assistant.

Which honestly is what most travelers need.

The Biggest Problem With AI Travel Planners

Image
Image

The main issue is this:

AI tools are great at writing about travel.

But not always great at planning travel.

Planning requires:

  • logistics
  • real world constraints
  • transportation timing
  • budget awareness

That’s hard.

Even humans struggle with it.

My Biggest Lesson From This Test

Image

AI travel planning is useful.

But it’s not a replacement for thinking.

Right now the best workflow looks like:

AI → rough plan
Human → sanity check
Google Maps → reality check

Think of AI like a very enthusiastic intern.

Helpful.

But you still need supervision.

Final Thoughts

Image

AI travel tools are improving fast.

Two years ago they barely worked.

Now some of them are actually useful.

But if an AI ever suggests:

Lisbon → Prague → Athens in 3 days…

Close the tab immediately.

Your luggage deserves better.

If you’re curious about AI travel tools, experiments, and travel tech, I write about these things often.

Because sometimes the best way to understand new technology is simple:

Give it a ridiculous task… and see what breaks. 🌍✈️